Movie Review - Penny Serenade (1941)

An unremarkable (by today's standards)be able to bear children anymore. But why did
childrearing melodrama in which Cary Grantthey have to go to Japan to arrive at that point
delivers a performance so good that he wasis a moot script question that is left unanswered.
nominated for a Best Actor Oscar. GeorgeCouldn't the same fate befall Julie if she had
Stevens directed the script by Morrie Ryskind.Theanother accident closer to home? Why did they
whole movie unfolds as a series of linearhave to go all the way to Japan, is not clear. The
flashbacks, each triggered by the LP records awhole "Tokyo episode" stands out like a joke
disconsolate Julie (Irene Dunne) is playing on awithout a punch line.The rest of this drama
gramophone just before she leaves her house forunfolds as the story of the married couple's
good. The reason? There does not seem to bedesperate effort to adopt a child, and once
anything left in her marriage to keep her there.adopted, not to lose her.There is yet another
We are soon to learn the reason why and all the"baby sequence" in the middle of the movie which
tragic events that led her to that wistfulcould easily be part of an unrelated comedy.
moment.The first couple of times the revolving LPGrant again excels in this sequence, almost paying
record dissolves into a "memory hole" throughtribute to the early years he spent during his
which we enter a slice of life in Julie's past, weteens as a pantomime and acrobat with Bob
enjoy it as a manifestation of a director'sPender's troupe. We see the young couple going
creativity. But the sixth or the seventh time thatthrough many of the anxieties in taking care of
happens, we wonder how many times we havetheir adopted 5-week daughter. (Is she asleep or
to suffer the same unrelentingly mechanical idea.did she quit breathing?)They are so inexperienced,
It gets old pretty quickly proving that consistencythey don't even know how to hold a baby or
is not always a virtue.Cary Grant plays the youngbath her and change her diaper.But we can't also
and dashing newspaper reporter Roger Adamshelp notice the progress of a father-daughter
who marries the love of his life Julie (played bybonding between Grant and his infant daughter
Irene Dunne) on the eve of his departure todespite the fact that originally he asked for a
Tokyo to take over his newspaper's Japan2-year old boy "with blond curly hair and blue
bureau. It also happens to be the Christmas night,eyes."For the first couple of years Roger's newly
complete with the obligatory snowfall (as inestablished weekly newspaper business, helped by
another Cary Grant movie, BISHOP'S WIFEthe press veteran Applejack, seems to be
(1948)).Once established in Tokyo, Roger has Juliemaking the ends meet. But then his business
join him at his new opulent digs complete with atakes a sudden downturn and suddenly he is a
family of Japanese house servants. Julie is bothman without an income.Since they are still at a
delighted and astonished that Roger can sustain"probationary period" in their adoption process, the
that level of luxury with only a reporter's salary.ever-vigilant adoption agency in the person of
We remember an earlier scene in which her friendMiss Oliver (Beulah Bondi) takes Roger to court.
Applejack (Edgar Buchanan) warned her againstThe judge is supposed to take the girl back
getting involved with a journalist. Is therebecause a family without income is not a fit place
something shady about Roger or past that wefor any child to grow up in.However, Cary grant in
would know about yet?Two interesting thingsyet another excellent scene, delivers this really
happen during the "Tokyo sequence" that bringemotional monologue about the pain of separation
both Roger's character and the script's strengthfrom his daughter, and the absurdity of taking a
into question.In the first scene, Roger announceschild back as though she was a car or a furniture
Julie that he has quit his job thanks to his familyrepossessed because the owner has been late in
inheritance. Now they can go travel around thepayments. His appeal as a heartbroken father
world before they settle down and raise a family,wins the day and the judge allows him to take
although during their dating period Roger showedher back home.After so many spinning
some reluctance to suffer pranks of children (thegramophone records dissolving into flashback
beach scene) gladly.It turns out what Roger callsscenes, we watch the child grow and take a small
"an inheritance" is just about ten thousand dollars,part in a Christmas play at school as her very
which shrinks further down to $8,000 after heproud parents watch her and give all their support
pays his outstanding bills. It is a let down for Julie.despite a minor mishap on the stage that ruins
He accuses Roger by acting "childishly." We'll seeher day.Then disaster strikes, as it should in a
this pattern for the rest of the movie: Roger willtragedy. We read in a letter written to Miss Oliver
always come across as a man with grand ideasthat the child has died following an illness. Since up
and much self-confidence who, however, can'tto that point we have not seen a single scene in
deliver the bacon at the end.The secondwhich the child suffered from any physical
important development in the "Tokyo sequence"ailments, this also comes across as contrived a
is the earthquake that levels their home. As weplot point as the earlier " Tokyo earthquake."After
continue to watch to see the "payoff" of thisthe death of their daughter Roger and Julie's union
totally unexpected natural disaster, the filmstarts to unravel quickly. The girl was the bond
abruptly shifts back to San Francisco where Juliethat kept them together.
is lying in a hospital and she learns that she will not