Why Recessions Happen and How to Counter Them

Recessions happen when people cash to anybelieve otherwise. Wherever there is money,
other type of asset or investment.human psychology is in operation and with it
The fate of modern economies is determined byeconomic malaise. Hence the need for
four types of demand: the demand for consumergovernmental micromamangement of the private
goods; the demand for investment goods; thesector at all times. Self-regulation is a costly and
demand for money; and the demand for assets,self-deceiving urban legend.
which represent the expected utility of moneyAnother engine of state involvement is provided
(deferred money).by the thrift paradox. When the economy goes
Periods of economic boom are characterized by asour, rational individuals and households save more
heightened demand for goods, both consumerand spend less. The aggregate outcome of their
and investment; a rising demand for assets; andnewfound thrift is recessionary: decreasing
low demand for actual money (low savings, lowconsumption translates into declining corporate
capitalization, high leverage).profitability and rising unemployment. These
Investment booms foster excesses (for instance:effects are especially pronounced when financial
excess capacity) that, invariably lead totransmission mechanisms (banks and other
investment busts. But, economy-wide recessionsfinancial institutions) are gummed up: frozen in fear
are not triggered exclusively and merely byand distrust, they do not lend money, even
investment busts. They are the outcomes of athough deposits (and their own capital base) are
shift in sentiment: a rising demand for money atever growing.
the expense of the demand for goods andIt is true that, by diversifying risk away, via the
assets.use of derivatives and other financial instruments,
In other words, a recession is brought aboutasset markets no longer affect the real economy
when people start to rid themselves of assetsas they used to. They have become, in a sense,
(and, in the process, deleverage); when they"gated communities", separated from Main Street
consume and lend less and save more; and whenby "risk barriers". But, these developments do not
they invest less and hire fewer workers. Apertain to retail banks and when markets are
newfound predilection for cash andilliquid and counterparty risk rampant, options
cash-equivalents is a surefire sign of impendingand swaps are pretty useless.
and imminent economic collapse.The only way to effectively cancel out the this
This etiology indicates the cure: reflation. Printingdemonetization of the national economy (this
money and increasing the money supply are"bleeding") is through enhanced government
bound to have inflationary effects. Inflation oughtspending. Where fearful citizens save, their
to reduce the public's appetite for a depreciatinggovernment should spend on infrastructure,
currency and push individuals, firms, and banks tohealth, education, and information technology. The
invest in goods and assets and reboot thestate's negative savings should offset multiplying
economy. Government funds can also be usedprivate savings. In extremis, the state should
directly to consume and invest, although thenationalize the financial sector for a limited period
impact of such interventions is far from certain.of times (as Israel has done in 1983 and Sweden,
GOVERNMENTS  a decade later).
It is a maxim of current economic orthodoxy thatA Note on GDP (Gross Domestic Product)
governments compete with the private sector onThe formula to calculate GDP is this:
a limited pool of savings. It is considered equallyGDP (Gross Domestic Product) =
self-evident that the private sector is better,Consumption + investment + government
more competent, and more efficient at allocatingexpenditure + net exports (exports minus
scarce economic resources and thus atimports) =
preventing waste. It is therefore thoughtWages + rents + interest + profits + non-income
economically sound to reduce the size ofcharges + net foreign factor  income earnedBut
government - i.e., minimize its tax intake and itsthe GDP figure is vulnerable to "creative
public borrowing - in order to free resources foraccounting":
the private sector to allocate productively and1. The weight of certain items, sectors, or
efficiently.activities is reduced or increased in order to
Yet, both dogmas are far from being universallyinfluence GDP components, such as industrial
applicable.production. Developing countries often alter the
The assumption underlying the first conjecture isway critical components of GDP like industrial
that government obligations and corporate lendingproduction are tallied.
are perfect substitutes. In other words, once2. Goods in inventory are included in GDP although
deprived of treasury notes, bills, and bonds - anot yet sold. Thus, rising inventories, a telltale sign
rational investor is expected to divert her savingsof economic ill-health, actually increases the GDP!
to buying stocks or corporate bonds.3. If goods produced are financed with credits and
It is further anticipated that financial intermediariesloans, GDP will be artificially HIGH (inflated).
- pension funds, banks, mutual funds - will tread4. In some countries, PLANS and INTENTIONS to
similarly. If unable to invest the savings of theirinvest are counted, recorded, and booked as
depositors in scarce risk-free - i.e., government -actual investments. This practice is frowned upon
securities - they will likely alter their investment(and landed quite a few corporate managers in
preferences and buy equity and debt issued bythe gaol), but is still widespread in the shoddier and
firms.shadier corners of the globe.
Yet, this is expressly untrue. Bond buyers and5. GDP figures should be adjusted for inflation (real
stock investors are two distinct crowds. Their riskGDP as opposed to nominal GDP). To achieve
aversion is different. Their investmentthat, the calculation of the GDP deflator is critical.
preferences are disparate. Some of them - e.g.,But the GDP deflator is a highly subjective figure,
pension funds - are constrained by law as to theprone, in developing countries, to reflecting the
composition of their investment portfolios. Oncegovernment's political needs and predilections.
government debt has turned scarce or expensive,6. What currency exchange rates were used? By
bond investors tend to resort to cash. That cashselecting the right "points in time", GDP figures can
- not equity or corporate debt - is the veritablego up and down by up to 2%!
substitute for risk-free securities is a basic tenet7. Healthcare expenditures, agricultural subsidies,
of modern investment portfolio theory.government aid to catastrophe-stricken areas
Moreover, the "perfect substitute" hypothesisform a part of the GDP. Thus, for instance, by
assumes the existence of efficient markets andincreasing healthcare costs, the government can
frictionless transmission mechanisms. But this is amanipulate GDP figures.
conveniently idealized picture which has little to do8. Net exports in many developing countries are
with grubby reality. Switching from one kind ofnegative (in other words, they maintain a trade
investment to another incurs - often prohibitive -deficit). How can the GDP grow at all in these
transaction costs. In many countries, financialplaces? Even if consumption and investment are
intermediaries are dysfunctional or corrupt orstrongly up - government expenditures are usually
both. They are unable to efficiently convertdown (at the behest of multilateral financial
savings to investments - or are wary of doing so.institutions) and net exports are down. It is not
Furthermore, very few capital and financialpossible for GDP to grow vigorously in a country
markets are closed, self-contained, orwith a sizable and ballooning trade deficit.
self-sufficient units. Governments can and do9. The projections of most international, objective
borrow from foreigners. Most rich world countriesanalysts and international economic organizations
- with the exception of Japan - tap "foreignusually tend to converge on a GDP growth figure
people's money" for their public borrowing needs.that is often lower than the government's but in
When the US government borrows more, itline with the long-term trend. These figures are
crowds out the private sector in Japan - not infar better indicators of the true state of the
the USA.economy. Statistics Bureaus in developing
It is universally agreed that governments have atcountries are often under the government's
least two critical economic roles. The first is tothumb and run by political appointees.
provide a "level playing field" for all economicEXPECTATIONS
players. It is supposed to foster competition,Economies revolve around and are determined by
enforce the rule of law and, in particular, property"anchors": stores of value that assume pivotal
rights, encourage free trade, avoid distorting fiscalroles and lend character to transactions and
incentives and disincentives, and so on. Its secondeconomic players alike. Well into the 19 century,
role is to cope with market failures and thetangible assets such as real estate and
provision of public goods. It is expected to step incommodities constituted the bulk of the
when markets fail to deliver goods and services,exchanges that occurred in marketplaces, both
when asset bubbles inflate, or when economicnational and global. People bought and sold land,
resources are blatantly misallocated.buildings, minerals, edibles, and capital goods. These
Yet, there is a third role. In our post-Keynesianwere regarded not merely as means of
world, it is a heresy. It flies in the face of theproduction but also as forms of wealth.
"Washington Consensus" propagated by theInevitably, human society organized itself to
Bretton-Woods institutions and by developmentfacilitate such exchanges. The legal and political
banks the world over. It is the government'ssystems sought to support, encourage, and
obligation to foster growth.catalyze transactions by enhancing and enforcing
In most countries of the world - definitely inproperty rights, by providing public goods, and by
Africa, the Middle East, the bulk of Latin America,rectifying market failures.
central and eastern Europe, and central and eastLater on and well into the 1980s, symbolic
Asia - savings do not translate to investments,representations of ownership of real goods and
either in the form of corporate debt or in theproperty (e.g, shares, commercial paper,
form of corporate equity.collateralized bonds, forward contracts) were all
In most countries of the world, institutions do notthe rage. By the end of this period, these
function, the rule of law and properly rights aresurpassed the size of markets in underlying
not upheld, the banking system is dysfunctionalassets. Thus, the daily turnover in stocks, bonds,
and clogged by bad debts. Rusty monetaryand currencies dwarfed the annual value added in
transmission mechanisms render monetary policyall industries combined.
impotent.Again, Mankind adapted to this new environment.
In most countries of the world, there is noTechnology catered to the needs of traders and
entrepreneurial and thriving private sector and thespeculators, businessmen and middlemen.
economy is at the mercy of external shocks andAdvances in telecommunications and
fickle business cycles. Only the state can countertransportation followed inexorably. The concept of
these economically detrimental vicissitudes. Often,intellectual property rights was introduced. A
the sole engine of growth and the exclusivefinancial infrastructure emerged, replete with highly
automatic stabilizer is public spending. Not all typesspecialized institutions (e.g., central banks) and
of public expenditures have the desired effect.businesses (for instance, investment banks,
Witness Japan's pork barrel spending onjobbers, and private equity funds).
"infrastructure projects". But development-relatedWe are in the throes of a third wave. Instead of
and consumption-enhancing spending is usuallybuying and selling assets one way (as tangibles) or
beneficial.the other (as symbols) - we increasingly trade in
To say, in most countries of the world, thatexpectations (in other words, we transfer risks).
"public borrowing is crowding out the privateThe markets in derivatives (options, futures,
sector" is wrong. It assumes the existence of aindices, swaps, collateralized instruments, and so
formal private sector which can tap the credit andon) are flourishing.
capital markets through functioning financialSociety is never far behind. Even the most
intermediaries, notably banks and stockconservative economic structures and institutions
exchanges.now strive to manage expectations. Thus, for
Yet, this mental picture is a figment of economicexample, rather than tackle inflation directly,
imagination. The bulk of the private sector incentral banks currently seek to subdue it by
these countries is informal. In many of them,issuing inflation targets (in other words, they aim
there are no credit or capital markets to speakto influence public expectations regarding future
of. The government doesn't borrow from saversinflation).
through the marketplace - but internationally,The more abstract the item traded, the less
often from multilaterals.cumbersome it is and the more frictionless the
Outlandish default rates result in vertiginously highexchanges in which it is swapped. The smooth
real interest rates. Inter-corporate lending, barter,transmission of information gives rise to both
and cash transactions substitute for bank credit,positive and negative outcomes: more efficient
corporate bonds, or equity flotations. As a result,markets, on the one hand - and contagion on the
the private sector's financial leverage is minuscule.other hand; less volatility on the one hand - and
In the rich West $1 in equity generates $3-5 inswifter reactions to bad news on the other hand
debt for a total investment of $4-6. In the(hence the need for market breakers); the
developing world, $1 of tax-evaded equityimmediate incorporation of new data in prices on
generates nothing. The state has to pick up thethe one hand - and asset bubbles on the other
slack.hand.
Growth and employment are public goods andHitherto, even the most arcane and abstract
developing countries are in a perpetual state ofcontract traded was somehow attached to and
systemic and multiple market failures. Rather thanderived from an underlying tangible asset, no
lend to businesses or households - banks thrive onmatter how remotely. But this linkage may soon
arbitrage. Investment horizons are limited. Shouldbe dispensed with. The future may witness the
the state refrain from stepping in to fill up the gapbartering of agreements that have nothing to do
- these countries are doomed to inexorablewith real world objects or values.
decline.In days to come, traders and speculators will be
In times of global crisis, these observations pertainable to generate on the fly their own,
to rich and developed countries as well. Marketcustom-made, one-time, investment vehicles for
failures signify corruption and inefficiency in theeach and every specific transaction. They will do
private sector. Such misconduct and misallocationso by combining "off-the-shelf", publicly traded
of economic resources is usually thought to becomponents. Gains and losses will be determined
the domain of the public sector, but actually itby arbitrary rules or by reference to extraneous
goes on eveywhere in the economy.events. Real estate, commodities, and capital
Wealth destruction by privately-owned firms isgoods will revert to their original forms and
typical of economies with absent, lenient, or laxfunctions: bare necessities to be utilized and
regulation and often exceeds anything the publicconsumed, not speculated on.
administration does. Corruption, driven by avariceAlso Read
and fear, is common among entrepreneurs asGovernments and Growth
much as among civil servants. It is a myth toIs Education a Public Good?